[HTML][HTML] Safety monitoring of gene therapy for spinal muscular atrophy with onasemnogene abeparvovec–a single centre experience

J Friese, S Geitmann, D Holzwarth… - Journal of …, 2021 - content.iospress.com
J Friese, S Geitmann, D Holzwarth, N Müller, R Sassen, U Baur, K Adler, J Kirschner
Journal of neuromuscular diseases, 2021content.iospress.com
Background: Recently gene therapy with onasemnogene abeparvovec has been approved
for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). As the experience from clinical trials is
limited, there are still uncertainties for which patient population the treatment can be
considered safe and effective. Methods: We report our experience with eight consecutive
patients with SMA who were treated with the standard dose of onasemnogene abeparvovec
(1.1× 10 14 vg/kg) at the University Hospital Bonn, Germany. All patients received …
Abstract
Background:
Recently gene therapy with onasemnogene abeparvovec has been approved for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). As the experience from clinical trials is limited, there are still uncertainties for which patient population the treatment can be considered safe and effective.
Methods:
We report our experience with eight consecutive patients with SMA who were treated with the standard dose of onasemnogene abeparvovec (1.1× 10 14 vg/kg) at the University Hospital Bonn, Germany. All patients received prophylactic immunosuppression with 1 mg/kg/d prednisolone for four weeks starting on the day before gene therapy.
Results:
We treated eight patients (4 male, 4 female, age range 10–37 months) with a body weight between 7.1 and 11.9 kg. All patients had 2 or 3 copies of the SMN2-gene and were previously treated with nusinersen. Following treatment with onasemnogene abeparvovec all patients showed a temporary increase of the body temperature and an increase of transaminase levels. In all but one patient it was necessary to increase or prolong the standard steroid dose to control the immune response. In one severe case, liver damage was associated with impaired liver function. This patient received a steroid pulse therapy for five days. Blood counts revealed asymptomatic thrombocytopenia (< 150× 10 9/L) in 6/8 patients and a significant increase of monocytes following gene therapy. Liver values and blood counts returned to almost normal levels during the post-treatment observation period. Troponin I increased above normal limit in 4/8 patients but was not associated with any abnormalities on cardiac evaluation.
Conclusions:
In a broader spectrum of patients, treatment with onasemnogene abeparvovec was associated with a higher rate of adverse events. In our cases it was possible to control the immune response by close monitoring and adaptation of the immunosuppressive regimen. Further research is needed to better understand the immune response following gene therapy and ideally to identify patients at risk for a more severe reaction.
content.iospress.com